data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bb15/0bb15af3874220d5f662dcd7243959eb9844bcda" alt=""
Boats in Ciqnue Terre (2023, Sony A7RIV)
This is a typical example of a passable image. It works pinted or in SDR but in HDR it really is like being there in the moment.
Photography is as much about light and equipment as it is about human perception—while it is nothing like reality. Form, contrast and subtetly are some of the elements that make art out of a picture but light is what makes a picture. It is the way the photographer uses the limitations inherent to each medium in combination with the human perception that makes the difference between a snapshot and a work of art. HDR photography opens a new domain in photography by providing a new set of limitations that are completely different to those, for instance, provided by printing on fine art paper. The sheer amount of light available in HDR photography is indeed a unique opportunity to recreate lifelike experiences and depict high contrast scenes without having to compress the dynamic range of an image within the traditional formats (e.g. paper, SDR screens or projected slide films). It is not so much a question of projection vs. reflection (a classic argument between printed images and projected slides or monitors), which provides different options to convey impressions and emotions, but a stunning new opportunity based on a new archetype. While printing large format fine art images and presenting them in a gallery provides a unique opportunity to create an experience, HDR is an up to date way to reach a large audience with your work.
This image is arguably the best and easiest example to show how our brain works. Sight is the combination of the light perceived by the retina and the interpretation that our brain does of the raw information, which can be quite impressive as the tiles A and B are absolutely identical! There are many factors that influence our 'sight' or better said perception. Some depend on our habits and others are embedded in our brains. We recongize human faces without being aware of it and strongly enhance their visibility, exactly as it happens with the tile in the checkerboard under the shadow. Great painters and photogrpahers are aware of the inner workings of our brains and constantly make use of these enhacements to create great paintings and images. It is my opinion that the content of an image as well as the presentation (e.g. low-key, high-key and black&white) work together to strongly influence our mood and how we react to image itself. That is why HDR plays a new role but does not exclude the other forms of presenting images: it simply provides a new experience.
I have always been curious about new technologies and eager to exploit their potential. Exactly as it happened back at the end of the last century with digital photography, today I find myself empowered to present my pictures in a way that was simply inconceivable until yesterday. Be warned however that the hardware and software that enables HDR Photography is still emerging and there is no standard yet. As of the end of 2023 all MacBook Pro, iPad Pro and iPhone Pro (from 15) offer stunning 1600 NITS of HDR maximum output. This is nothing short of incredible and enough to experience pictures in a new way. Arguably the standard requires 2000 NITS, but there are very few displays able to achieve it and definitely not for a consumer compatible price tag. Things have changed for the production of images with the new versions of Photoshop and Lightroom, as they both support HDR natively and no longer as a beta feature; on the consumption side it is still quite complex and despite videos in HDR are now more and more standard (even Instagram greatly profits from that), pictures still are in a sort of work-in-progress status. Nothwithstanding the hurdles consuming HDR pictures is a great experience that gives a level of realism that completely changes our expectations... for a certain type of images. So what is my experience with HDR applied to my pictures? there are actually three different categories of images that I found: one that includes all images that where great in SDR and simply different but equally great in HDR; another that includes images that I never liked in SDR and I kept only out of curiosity about what the future may hold for them; and the last about the images that absolutely do not profit from HDR because of their Gestalt.
This is my first HDR Gallery. It includes pictures spanning over 20 years, some were good printed or in SDR and others really enjoy from HDR.
This is a typical example of a passable image. It works pinted or in SDR but in HDR it really is like being there in the moment.
A pleasing picture that looks just as good printed, in SDR and in HDR.
This large panorama could be printed basically any size, but in HDR it comes to life. However, this is very difficult to consume as TVs are not that large.
This pictures looks better in BW and arguably this also allows to have a great SDR version. However, HDR is easy to present and requires very little manipulation.
The twilight in the Southwest is simply stunning but this picture was never ever enjoyable. Here HDR really makes the difference.
This is an example of what the RAW conversion software has become today. The result in HDR, coming from a small sensor camera is incredible.
Although I somehow liked this image I never really used or presented it. It was simply too obvious. In HDR it explodes.
One of my first pictures with the 1Ds. I always loved it and used it in many occasions. HDR just adds more realism.
A panorama created with a shift lens. Definitely good printed and in SDR, just more alive in HDR.
One of my best images (I took many that morning even in full darkness). This version was taken with a minute long exposure at freezing temperatures and is developed with the intent to show the invisible twilight in HDR.
Of the many images I took at Point Lobos, this one never made the cut. Surprisinlgy, in HDR it is not too bad.
I was hoping to extract something from a day in Val Maggia but had to accept that the result was really not what I wanted. When I reviewed the pictures in HDR, this one stood out as passable.
In SDR this image can be very pleasing and in HDR it is simply different.
I was never able to like this image in SDR, it is simply dull. In HDR it really stands out.
Another picture that I took in quite many ways. This specific one tries to enhance the HDR advantage. Needless to say in SDR and printed it is very pleasing as well.
Great in SDR and printed. HDR only gives an extra punch and a tad of realism.
Here the advantage of HDR is really small. The image is really pleasing in any way but HDR adds a degree of realism that makes me remember the sensations of being there.
The light was great and the fall colors mesmerizing, but without HDR I never really liked this image. Now it is what I wanted.
In SDR this image is simply dull and does not bring any emotion. In HDR it found a new life.
I never liked this image, neither printed nor in SDR. In HDR it is finally passable.
I always liked this picture and ptinted it alot. In HDR it is simply different.
The valley where I took this picture is simply wonderful. HDR does not add much.
The subject was simply fantastic but the light a total disaster. I never liked this image but in HDR it is slightly better.
I was surprised by how well HDR works with this image that was best printed on fine-art-paper.
Being there during the last light of the evening was incredible, the light so intense. I was saddened because I could not reproduce the sensation but then I discovered HDR (this is actually my first picture in HDR).
A large panorama that is very pleasing in SDR and simply different in HDR.
Slightly dull in SDR, now much better in HDR.
This is a typical HDR subject.
The experience of the rocks in the Monument Valley the day I visited was incredible but without HDR the colors did not make it justice. Now it is different.
Just a snapshot from a paragliding day many years ago, but in HDR the sails stand out (despite being a 3 megapixels image from 2002).
Even in the shadows, depending on the conditions, HDR can be better than SDR.
The unique drone perspective and the fall colors make of this picture something nice, but the low resolution and the noise of the small camera made it not so pleasing. HDR helps covering for these defects.
One of my favourite pictures, great printed on fine-art-paper and now in HDR. Over the years the RAW conversion got so better that I keep on ejoying developing this one.
Great printed on fine-art-paper and now in HDR.
I stopped becuase the light was simply incredible. It was just me and a photographer with a large format field camera. Maybe at the time he took a better picture, but today, in HDR, mine surely wins hands down.
High ISO, low light and small sensor. I stopped because I was attrcted by the light but was late and could not use the main camera. Only today, with better RAW noise control and HDR, I finally managed to develop this picture as I wanted.
A large panorama even better in HDR.
I took this picture in awe for the perfect light but never managed to develop it to convey the experience. The latest iterations of RAW conversion software and HDR made the deal.
Typical drone picture, just better in HDR but not strikingly.
A night picture slightly better in HDR.
A gigantic pixelshift image that could be printed on a wall, definitely better in HDR.
Another example of noise suppression (without loosing details) and HDR applied a very old image.
Typical drone picture, just better in HDR but not strikingly.
An example on night street photography that is made for HDR.